Anya Taylor-Joy in The Queen's Gambit
One of my favorite television programs over the last several years is the limited series The Queen's Gambit, a tale of a young chess prodigy who becomes a world champion chess player. The prodigy here, Beth Harmon (played by Anya Taylor-Joy), lies in bed at night and stares up at the ceiling, where she visualizes a chess board and all of the pieces, which she moves around mentally to plot out her moves, her opponent's moves, and moves after that and after that. The hallmark of a skilled chess player is the ability to see a number of moves ahead--and how her own moves would likely lead to certain moves by her opponent.
Investing is really all about the future, what's going to happen next. In fact, the very act of buying a stock at least signals a belief that there will be a future at all. The past, of course, plays a role here. A long track record of growing revenues, profitability, and increasing dividends may be what calls our attention to a company in the first place. But what forces might be at work to change the trajectory of that past success? If you bought shares of JC Penney at the end of the twentieth century, you'd probably be gnashing your teeth and asking, How did I miss this? On the other hand, if you saw that an online bookseller named Amazon might expand to become the behemoth of retail, or that a mail-order DVD rental company called Netflix might be delivering movies to your television, you would be on the first steps to finding the pot of gold. You would have grasped the multiple moves ahead. No easy task, but a possible one.
Let's take a look at where we have been in the stock market. In March of 2022, the Federal Reserve, under the leadership of Jerome Powell, started raising interest rates in an effort to quell inflation. The Fed was a bit late tending to this, as they had been dismissing inflation then as "transitory." Rising interest rates are anathema for the stock market because, simply put, higher rates reduce the present value of future earnings--and that is what a stock's price is, the discounted present value of future earnings. So that started the roller coaster ride of equity prices, with investors hanging onto every word and nuance from Jerome Powell.
Now, as of last week, it looks as if the Fed may be achieving the miraculous and much-sought-after "soft landing" for the economy. That means that maybe--just maybe--the Fed has raised interest rates just enough to dampen inflation without overshooting and sending the economy into a recession. We shall see--and hope that Mr. Powell doesn't crash the plane. This is why the market rallied so strongly this past week. We may have the so-called "pivot" in the Fed's interest rate policy, as Powell actually said something about interest rate cuts in 2024. It will turn out to be nothing of a pivot, of course, if inflation re-accelerates and the Fed has to raise rates further to achieve their inflation goals.
What does this mean for our chess game plan for the coming year? Research suggests that some 90% of a stock's performance is due to the movement of the overall market. So even if you pick the perfect stocks, you can still be hammered by a market that is trending down. This latest news from the Fed may mean that the worst is over for the relentless hiking of interest rates that has caused so much investor suffering--maybe as close to a "green light" as we're going to get. So while I won't assume that the market will be overwhelmingly favorable, I will assume that it is no longer downright hostile. And because the market is always looking ahead, if you wait for the Fed to actually start cutting rates, you'll probably miss the boat.
Here are some ideas:
Quanta Services (PWR, $215). I like to find companies that stand to benefit from a clearly identifiable trend. PWR provides comprehensive infrastructure solutions to utility companies and the renewable energy sector. How trendy is that?
Arista Networks (ANET, $238). Since I am so plugged into the financial media, I am surprised that I haven't heard more about this stock. I first bought shares in 2016, at about $22 per share. That makes this stock a "ten-bagger," much sought after but rarely found. They are in the computer networking business.
What these two companies have in common is that they are not what I call "consumer facing." That is, unlike, say, Nike or Coca Cola, you and I don't see their products or buy them directly. That means we have to do a little work to uncover them.
Rising interest rates can be hard on dividend-paying stocks, as the interest return from fixed-income securities provides a rewarding option for investors seeking income. If interest rates stabilize or fall, those dividend payers look more attractive. Some reliable names here include Proctor and Gamble (PG, $146) and Johnson and Johnson (JNJ, $155). The COVID pandemic made me realize that toilet paper is not the commodity that I thought it was--I have to have my Charmin (made by P&G).
Unless you think that 2024 will usher in a new era of world peace, the defense stocks are worth a look. I don't see an "Age of Aquarius" looming on the horizon. If anything, the world is an increasingly dangerous place. Lockheed Martin (LMT, $447) is a name here, with a dividend yield of 2.8%.
The most challenging chess board of all may be the result of the changes that are coming with Artificial Intelligence (AI). Something that is true in investing that does not necessarily hold for other areas of life is that we know the motivation of the players: to make money. (I am stunned at how people often don't acknowledge this core fact of economic life. Make money today, and use your new wealth to change the world tomorrow--not vice-versa.) Skilled management (and they had better be geniuses for all the millions they are paid) will be plotting those chess moves, all with the aim of making their companies more profitable. When it comes to the technology behind AI, NVIDIA (NVDA, $493) is the leader, as they make the complex computer chips making it all work. And we can be certain that NVDA will not start making chocolate chips instead of computer chips.
While it is understandable and natural for investors to focus on the companies developing the technology, I also want to focus some chess moves on who will benefit from using the technology. That field is wide open. No one thought of Walmart as having anything to do with high-tech, but over the years they have benefitted from using the latest technology. Who is going to use AI to build the next revolutionary "better mouse trap"? That is the investor's gambit.
Life is short. Get Busy. And Merry Christmas!!!
Jim
Disclosure/Disclaimer: My family members and/or I have positions in PWR, ANET, PG, JNJ, and NVDA. Individual stocks are mentioned here for the sole purpose of illustrating investment concepts, and nothing stated here should be construed as the advice to buy or sell any security.
Copyright 2023 James Brinkley Taylor, Jr.
Email me with any questions, comments, or feedback:
jbrinkleytaylor@gmail.com